The James Webb Space Telescope, glossy golden mirror and all, just took a test.
For nearly 100 days at NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston, the telescope sat inside Chamber A—an airless, pitch-black, unimaginably cold compartment that simulates the lethal conditions of the cosmos.
Temperatures throughout the chamber, regulated by NASA engineers, can go as low as minus 440 degrees Fahrenheit.
Within that vacuum, the telescope and its instruments were put through their paces.
“An incredible number of components have to come together and work in cryogenic temperatures,” says Eric Smith, the Webb’s program director.
The Webb worked. “The performance beat expectations,” says NASA.
Now, with a rescheduled launch date, the telescope is set for liftoff sometime between March and June of 2019.
But Smith, a NASA scientist for nearly thirty years, remembers when the Webb was scarcely more than a sketch.
“We started in the spring of ’96,” he says. “We drew it on a whiteboard.”
More than twenty years later, those crude whiteboard renditions have morphed into the most sophisticated space telescope ever.
Webb’s primary mirror is enormous—21 feet across, divided into 18 sections, and capable of collecting more than six times the light of the Hubble Space Telescope, its predecessor. Unfolded, the mirror shapes as a hexagon, like the cell of a honeycomb.
Factor in the mirror’s size with NASA’s upgraded technology and a superior observational spot in space, and Webb’s capabilities far surpass Hubble’s.
“We say 100 times more powerful than Hubble,” says Smith.
One critical component is the sunshield, a celestial parasol to shade the electronics from the Sun.
Without the sunshield—which has an SPF of one million—the Webb would fry.
Five layers of plastic essentially provide the protection. Each thin membrane, astoundingly slight, is comparable to the thickness of a single human hair.
“Very thin plastic, but extremely tough,” says John Mather, senior project scientist for the Webb.
But unfurling the sunshield, the size of a tennis court when fully opened, could be tricky in space.
“You’ve got a good part of an acre of plastic film that’s got to do the right thing,” says Mather, a NASA astrophysicist since 1974 and a winner of the 2006 Nobel Prize in Physics. “So naturally, we are rehearsing that a lot.”
Along with rehearsal, there’s redundancy. The telescope is not serviceable in space. One million miles from Earth is too far for a house call. The list of what could go wrong—such a list literally exists—is scarily long: “It has probably a thousand entries,” Mather says. “That’s why, where we can, we have two of everything.”
Webb, which sees in infrared, will observe the first stars and galaxies to light up after the Big Bang. “We’re looking back about 13.7 billion years,” says Mather.
The telescope will also search for signs of life on alien worlds—specifically, by analyzing the chemical composition of their atmospheres.
Already, NASA has targeted a few exoplanets for Webb, including TRAPPIST-1d, discovered earlier this year, one of seven Earth-sized worlds in the TRAPPIST-1 system.
Finding a substantial quantity of oxygen in an exoplanet’s atmosphere qualifies as an astronomical holy grail. That won’t prove life is there, certainly. “But it’s a hint the planet might be alive,” says Mather.
Even so, scientists insist the biggest discoveries—the stunning revelations—are almost always unexpected.
“Some of the most exciting things Hubble did, nobody foresaw ahead of time,” says Smith. “I’m sure the same is going to be true for Webb.”
Agrees Mather: “Very few discoveries in astronomy were predicted before they were seen. I think we’ll have all new textbooks.” Seems the galaxy’s most common element, notwithstanding hydrogen, is surprise.
Friend me on Facebook. Follow me on Twitter @BillRford. Find “Little Green Men,” my Columbia University prize-winning thesis, now an Amazon Kindle Single, here.